Ohio POW MIA

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Military uniform
  • Military science
  • Military headlines
  • Military alliance
  • Military budget

Ohio POW MIA

Header Banner

Ohio POW MIA

  • Home
  • Military uniform
  • Military science
  • Military headlines
  • Military alliance
  • Military budget
Military alliance
Home›Military alliance›Russia and China are not looking for a “military alliance”, but rather a “strategic partnership” of the most powerful type

Russia and China are not looking for a “military alliance”, but rather a “strategic partnership” of the most powerful type

By Susan T. Johnson
December 20, 2019
0
0


Russia and China have denied plans to enter into a formal military alliance, even as the two powers increasingly work together in multiple areas, praised the relationship they forged and now support it. represents a new form of superior cooperation in the face of difficult relations with the United States.

During his big annual press conference Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin was explicit: “We do not have a military alliance with China and we do not plan to create one”.

At a time when Moscow and Beijing are involved in more joint efforts than ever before, Putin said that following in Washington’s footsteps by forging official defense pacts like the United States has done with Japan and Korea South would be “counterproductive, and that doesn’t bode well.”

Instead, the Russian leader said, his intention to help China with defense projects such as a new missile early warning radar system was “to add a new quality to the defense capability. of our strategic partner “.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang agreed. He said at a press briefing on Friday that “Sino-Russian relations have shown strong vitality and broad prospects after resisting the changing international landscape over the past seven decades” and “are become an example for a new type of relations between large countries characterized by close cooperation “, partnership instead of alliance and dialogue instead of confrontation.

“The Sino-Russian comprehensive strategic coordination partnership for a new era has become a great country relationship characterized by the highest degree of mutual trust, the highest level of coordination and the highest strategic value,” he said. added, noting that this partnership “will not target a third party and will not be affected by any third party” – a clear reference to worried minds in the West.

Russian, Chinese and Mongolian. parade at the end of the day of jointly organized Vostok-2018 (Est-2018) military exercises at the Tsugol training ground in Siberia on September 13, 2018. China has joined an unprecedented number of Russian military exercises in recent times. years, providing crucial experience to the world’s largest standing armed forces.
MLADEN ANTONOV / AFP / Getty Images

Although the missile early warning radar system developed by the two countries for China’s use is defensive in nature, it signaled a new degree of collaboration for neighbors with a much longer history of mutual suspicion. Seventy years after establishing their relationship, Russia and China have overcome much of their Cold War-era feuds and both sides describe their relationship as the best it has ever been. .

Their position is that it is the United States that is stuck in a “cold war mentality”, a way of thinking dominated by “zero sum” tactics unrelated to an emerging and more multipolar world. Washington, however, sees two strategic competitors making gains in its global military and economic supremacy, while at the same time destabilizing a “rules-based international order” established in the aftermath of World War II.

Unlike the Warsaw Pact of the Soviet Union which collapsed with the Eastern Communist bloc in the 1990s, the US-led NATO military alliance has only grown. , now covering almost all of the Eastern European countries once aligned with the Moscow collective. Washington’s exit in 2002 from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty of 1972 allowed it to deploy advanced defense systems here, and its decision to move away from the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty paved the way for the installation of medium-range land launchers. missiles not seen for decades.

These steps have proven to be a fundamental frustration for Putin, who has witnessed the development of this “global missile shield” during his two decades of leadership. These weapons have not only been deployed in Europe, but also on Russia’s eastern flank in Asia-Pacific, making them a major concern for China.

Beijing, which has far fewer nuclear weapons than Moscow and Washington, has refused to enter into bilateral arms control agreements, including the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) which limits Russian and US nuclear arsenals and must expire in February 2021 if President Donald Trump refuses to extend it. Chinese President Xi Jinping has joined his Russian counterpart in investing heavily in military modernization, but it is the economic strength of the People’s Republic that has enabled it to compete globally.

Xi’s Belt and Road Intercontinental Initiative – a series of global infrastructure, technology and energy projects – has been rejected by the Trump administration as a ploy to trap countries in debt. For Putin, this is an opportunity to strengthen his own Eurasian Economic Union and push to attract more Chinese capital as he provides oil and joint military exercises.

The United States has accused the two countries of pursuing aggressive and underhanded tactics to advance their respective authoritarian agendas, while it accuses Washington of seeking to maintain global hegemony.

A chart provided by Statista shows the world’s top twelve national economies in purchasing power parity (PPP) in 2018, along with expected growth for next year.
Statistical

Yet commentators have long described the relationship between Moscow and Beijing as a marriage of convenience, and they were unlikely to fight big battles, even if that was part of their message to the world.

“Politically, especially militarily, I would say that we are moving forward, but we are not allies,” said the president of the Moscow-based PIR Center, Evgeny Buzhinskiy, a retired Russian lieutenant-general who is also vice-president of the Russian Council for International Affairs. News week last month. “This means that the two sides do not want to force each other to interfere. Russia does not want to interfere and militarily help the Chinese in its adjacent waters with all their conflicts with their neighbors, and China is not going to us. support militarily in if there is a conflict between NATO and Russia. “

As to why Moscow has not been able to form a new Eastern military pact, Bouzhinsky said that “unlike the Soviet Union, Russia is now not able to forge strong alliances, because if you create an alliance like the United States, you “I have to support it, let’s face it, you have to pay, Russia is not economically strong enough to pay for a strong alliance.”

He hailed the joint development by Russia and China of the missile early warning system as “a big step forward” and discussed future efforts in the Indian Ocean, the Arctic and beyond. “We are not allies”, he repeated, “but we are more than strategic partners”.

A chart provided by Statista ranks the 20 most powerful armies in the world based on 55 data points calculated by Global Firepower’s 2019 Power Index.
STATISTICS

This article uses graphics provided to Newsweek by Statistical.


Related posts:

  1. Trudeau to celebrate NATO anniversary amid questions over future of military alliance – Abbotsford News
  2. NATO is not just a military alliance, but a “politico-military alliance”, according to its leader Jens Stoltenberg
  3. Some countries have described Quad as a military alliance to raise “unfounded fears”: army chief
  4. China and Bangladesh should oppose powers outside the region forming a “military alliance” in South Asia, Chinese defense minister says
Tagsarmed forcescold warmilitary allianceunited statesvladimir putin

Categories

  • Military alliance
  • Military budget
  • Military headlines
  • Military science
  • Military uniform

Recent Posts

  • Japan to donate $2 million to IAEA for Ukrainian nuclear security
  • Falklands 40: Headlines from The News, Portsmouth, 18 May 1982
  • ANALYSIS-Putin takes Mariupol, but wider Donbass victory is out of reach
  • Charity food production chain reaches out to displaced people in Dnipro, Ukraine
  • Hungarian army finds mission in life for abused dog

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • May 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • July 2013
  • January 2011
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions