Ohio POW MIA

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Military uniform
  • Military science
  • Military headlines
  • Military alliance
  • Military budget

Ohio POW MIA

Header Banner

Ohio POW MIA

  • Home
  • Military uniform
  • Military science
  • Military headlines
  • Military alliance
  • Military budget
Military alliance
Home›Military alliance›NATO is a military alliance, not a club of values

NATO is a military alliance, not a club of values

By Susan T. Johnson
June 11, 2021
0
0


Launching an eight-day trip to Europe, the first of his presidency, President Joe Biden delivered a solemn message on his first stopover: Democracy as we know it risks losing its global relevance. Speaking to US troops stationed at RAF Mildenhall, Biden warned that authoritarians like China’s Xi Jinping and Russian Vladimir Putin would like nothing more than to see democratic governance wither on the vine.

“I believe we are at an inflection point in the history of the world,” Mr. Biden said noted. “We must discredit those who believe that the era of democracy is over, as some of our brethren believe.”

Halfway through its first year in office, the Biden administration adopted “democracy versus autocracy” as the organizing theme of its foreign policy. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has devoted a great deal of time to his first official speech the importance of not only defending democracy in the United States, but of using the United States-led alliance system around the world to contain and counter the Xis and Putin of the world. The promotion of democratic values, according to Blinken, is just as vital as the defense of American interests.

NATO, the 72-year-old transatlantic alliance, has served as the main instrument to promote these values. Hardly a week goes by without an alliance member invoking democracy, human rights or the rules-based international order in a speech or press briefing. Biden and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg have spoken of building on these values when they meet at the White House this week.

The irony, however, is that NATO was not meant to be driven by values. Fundamentally, the organization is a military alliance, and the preservation of the intransigent security interests of its members is (or at least should be) the main guiding principle.

This may be shocking, especially for those who were not alive during the Cold War. Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union 30 years ago, NATO has essentially evolved from a military organization expressly designed to contain hegemonic power into a vessel for the promotion of democratic governance across Europe and Eurasia. The alliance today is as concerned with consolidating and disseminating collective standards as it is with maintaining the security and territorial integrity of its members. NATO, in effect, operates like a country club: any potential member who pledges to abide by a certain set of rules and values ​​is eligible for membership, regardless of their actual military contribution to the alliance.

A photo taken on November 20, 2019 shows a NATO flag at NATO Headquarters in Brussels during a NATO Foreign Ministers Summit. – NATO Foreign Ministers meet ahead of the NATO Leaders’ Summit in London on 3-4 December 2019.
Kenzo TRIBOUILLARD / AFP / Getty Images

The problem, of course, is that NATO, at its heart, is still a defense alliance, with serious defense commitments and responsibilities attached to membership. Countries under NATO’s tent not only enjoy the collective defense privileges of the entire organization, but have a duty to come to the aid of any member whose security is threatened. article 5 of the NATO charterr — which states that an attack on one member is an attack on the whole alliance — is both an insurance policy for weaker members who could not necessarily defend themselves and a statement of deterrence against adversaries who might otherwise be tempted to act aggressively.

During the 1940s and 1950s such an arrangement was reasonable and indeed necessary. Hundreds of thousands of Soviet soldiers were then stationed in central and eastern Europe. In 1948, Soviet forces, eager to drive the United States, Great Britain and France completely out of Berlin, sought to cut supplies to the western half of the German capital and force a western retreat. Although the attempt failed, there remained considerable nervousness in Washington and Western Europe over Moscow making further strides westward. For the United States, Soviet domination of Europe was simply out of the question.

With the Soviet threat dead and buried, however, Europe no longer faces a potential hegemon in the east. Cyber ​​attacks, piecemeal annexations of Ukrainian territory and disinformation operations Aside from, today’s Russia is far from the conventional juggernaut that the Soviets were decades ago. A sudden Russian military push into the Baltic states is highly unlikely – and even if Vladimir Putin were reckless enough to attempt it, the costs associated with maintaining those positions would be too high for the weary, oil-dependent economy.

This does not mean that NATO is going to close its doors anytime soon. Eastern European members of the alliance, including Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, still have a lingering fear of their big neighbor to the east. NATO (and by extension the United States) is still a warm security blanket for many of them and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future.

Despite this, the world’s oldest military alliance is trying to figure out what to do with itself. Like a bald, middle-aged man who buys a convertible in an attempt to alleviate a midlife crisis, NATO is now on the lookout for new missions in Asia and elsewhere, welcoming insignificant new members with largely armed forces. inferiors and preaching on safeguarding values ​​in order to give oneself a purpose. Through it all, many forget the reason NATO was founded in the first place: to make a hostile invasion of Europe so costly that adversaries refrain from pursuing it.

When President Biden concludes his meeting at NATO Headquarters in Brussels next week, we will likely receive the usual lengthy joint statements becoming poetic about the longevity, successes and solidarity of the alliance. What NATO really needs, however, is a clear and honest internal conversation about how it works, what it needs to prioritize and why to invite more members and shift its focus to Asia. any meaning.

Daniel R. DePetris is a member of the Defense Priorities think tank, columnist for the Washington Examiner, and contributor to The National Interest.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author.


Related posts:

  1. Trudeau to celebrate NATO anniversary amid questions over future of military alliance – Abbotsford News
  2. NATO is not just a military alliance, but a “politico-military alliance”, according to its leader Jens Stoltenberg
  3. Some countries have described Quad as a military alliance to raise “unfounded fears”: army chief
  4. China and Bangladesh should oppose powers outside the region forming a “military alliance” in South Asia, Chinese defense minister says
Tagsarmed forcescold warjoe bidenmilitary alliancepresident joeunited statesvladimir putin

Categories

  • Military alliance
  • Military budget
  • Military headlines
  • Military science
  • Military uniform

Recent Posts

  • EXPLANATOR: What’s next after Russia cuts gas to Europe?
  • How ‘Invasion’ Showrunner Created Fact-Based Sci-Fi – The Hollywood Reporter
  • New interview room designed to empower survivors | Latest titles
  • Scientific News | Study reveals whether the military can rely on AI for automation
  • Military Uniforms Market Outlook 2022 and Forecast to 2029

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • May 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • July 2013
  • January 2011
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions