Ohio POW MIA

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Military uniform
  • Military science
  • Military headlines
  • Military alliance
  • Military budget

Ohio POW MIA

Header Banner

Ohio POW MIA

  • Home
  • Military uniform
  • Military science
  • Military headlines
  • Military alliance
  • Military budget
Military science
Home›Military science›How drones can be communication nodes in the sky

How drones can be communication nodes in the sky

By Susan T. Johnson
June 24, 2022
0
0

When army cadets at West Point train in the surrounding mountain valleys and field courses, they learn to wage war in what the military calls a “passively denied environment.” The term means that the natural landscape interferes with radio signals, making it difficult for soldiers in training to communicate as they might in an open field.

Although the military trains there and has decades of experience in warfare in urban and mountainous terrain, another possibility is to use new technologies to create a signal relay between soldiers in the field and commanders further afield. . To achieve this, the army is developing an “air level network”, or a system of flying machines that can serve as a signaling relay.

A “[Aerial Tier Network] allows us to send data up to an asset in the air level and then back down, allowing the signal to jump over obstacles to efficiently get more nodes and expand the communication area,” said Scott Newman, Project Manager within the Army Program Executive. Office Command Control Communications-Tactical.

In other words, having an aircraft available to relay signals means that soldiers fighting in a valley can share information with soldiers on the other side of the ridge, without worrying that the signal will be lost. As battlefields expand, encompassing villages, city districts, or large swaths of rugged terrain, staying in contact with friendly forces at a distance becomes more important.

[Related: The UK’s wee military recon drones will double as cartographers]

Losing communication can mean being isolated, ambushed, or simply not moving fast enough. Rather, maintaining a communication link can allow soldiers to outwit their enemies, spot weaknesses, share information about attacks, and maintain cohesion while fighting as part of a larger force.

During the 2021 Project Convergence Technology Demonstration, the military used drones to facilitate this communication over the hill, although the air level network can work with more than just drones. Provided the plane can receive and relay signals, the work could be done by circling planes, helicopters operating in the area, or even new planes being prepared under the Army’s Future Vertical Lift program.

In May, C4ISRNET reports, Greg Napoli of the Army Future Command Network Cross-Functional Team told an industry meeting that air level could mean everything from armed aircraft to aerostats, which are essentially tethered balloons with communication relays. Other options include large portable cell towers and drones.

Currently, this type of top-down communication is done through satellites, but satellites have limitations. While many communications networks aim for continuous and reliable global coverage, signals can be blocked by jammers and satellites could be vulnerable in the event of war if a country uses anti-satellite missiles or other space weapons to destroy them.

Instead, an aerial array can be brought to where the soldiers are and provides a communications link immediately above, with a link that can be dismantled and transported elsewhere as the fighting moves on. All of this is designed to improve the military’s ability to stay in contact and coordinate while away from friendly forces. This type of dispersed communication is called NLOS, for “Not Line of Sight”.

[Related: A next-gen tank will be revealed in October. Here’s what we know about it so far.]

Future developments to improve this type of networked communication will influence how the military develops its relay for airborne NLOS (RANGE) ground environments. Extending the distance over which a relay can operate, as the clumsy acronym RANGE suggests, allows soldiers to operate farther from each other while maintaining useful contact.

How an army talks to its constituents determines how it can fight. Modern warfare is sensor-rich, with cameras on drones and tanks, aircraft radars, thermal imaging in goggles worn by soldiers, and more, all contributing to a vast collection of information about field. Turning this information from sighting into action means analyzing and sharing it, leaving artillery a few miles behind to spot a target spotted by a drone piloted by scouts. The communication network between all these parties makes the whole operation sing, facilitating devastating assaults and clean retreats.

As the military develops new aircraft to support soldiers in the field, air networks link these aircraft to ground combat, making these relays crucial for army communication. Better communication between nearby forces means that when fighting takes place, reinforcements can be in place, allies can know where the danger lies, and the odds can be put in favor of the army. Firefights are chaotic moments, full of sound and danger as soldiers exchange fire and try to survive long enough to win.

With the Air Level Network, the military intends to make communication in difficult terrain as easy as it is on the plain.

Related posts:

  1. How military science popularized layered clothing
  2. LSU Military Science Building and declining program | Daily
  3. Military science joins forces with Lycée de Lyon to offer ROTC
  4. New Military Science Professor Brings ‘People-Centered’ Culture to Army ROTC | New

Categories

  • Military alliance
  • Military budget
  • Military headlines
  • Military science
  • Military uniform

Recent Posts

  • Iran begins enriching uranium to 60% purity at Fordow plant
  • Rome Science Museum
  • Scientific experiments with terrifying consequences
  • REVIEW | Netflix’s sleeper hit Warrior Nun S2 merges science and religion
  • Book review: The Political Science of the Middle East: Theory and Research Since the Arab Uprisings edited by Marc Lynch, Jillian Schwedler and Sean Yom

Archives

  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • December 2015
  • May 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • July 2013
  • January 2011
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions