Ohio POW MIA

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Military uniform
  • Military science
  • Military headlines
  • Military alliance
  • Military budget

Ohio POW MIA

Header Banner

Ohio POW MIA

  • Home
  • Military uniform
  • Military science
  • Military headlines
  • Military alliance
  • Military budget
Military science
Home›Military science›Are there really UFOs flying over Ukraine?

Are there really UFOs flying over Ukraine?

By Susan T. Johnson
October 15, 2022
0
0

Recent reports of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) flying over Ukrainian skies have been officially discredited by Ukraine’s national science agency, citing “significant errors” in the report’s methods and results.

The report, released in mid-September by scientists from the Kyiv Main Astronomical Observatory (MAO), describes “a significant number of objects whose nature is unclear‘, including several so-called ‘ghosts’ which appeared completely black against the sky and appeared to streak through the atmosphere at up to 33,000 mph (53,000 km/h) – about twice as fast as an intercontinental ballistic missile.

The report’s authors described these phantom objects as UAP – the scientific community’s preferred name for unidentified flying objects, or UFOs – but did not attempt to rule out more obvious explanations, such as satellites, drones or the artillery used in the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, which began about six months before the report was published.

Related: 9 things we learned about aliens in 2021

Now, the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NASU) has concluded an investigation into the UAP report and officially discredited it as unprofessional and lacking in scientific rigor.

“The processing and interpretation of the results were carried out at an inappropriate scientific level and with significant errors in determining the distances to the observed objects,” said a group of NASU scientists. written in a statement. The team added that the report “did not meet professional requirements for publishing the results of scientific research,” and ordered that NASU’s name be removed from the document.

Where is the fire?

In their report, MAO researchers analyzed sightings of strange, fast-moving objects detected by one of two observatories near Kyiv. The team inferred the distance, size and speed of these objects based on how much background light each appeared to block, concluding that many of the mystery objects were about the size of an airplane but moving in the atmosphere at the speed of a spaceship. .

However, by looking at data from only one telescope, the researchers appear to have inaccurately predicted the distances and locations of these objects – and therefore misjudged the objects’ size and speed, as well, according to the work of Avi Loeba Harvard University astrophysicist who recently published a critical article on Ukraine’s UAP report in the pre-print database, arXiv.org. (The work has not yet been peer reviewed.)

“The correct way to infer distances is called triangulation, where you look at the same object from different directions,” Loeb told Live Science. “But they don’t have that data.”

If the phantom objects were indeed as large, as fast, and as high in the sky as the Ukrainian team suggested, then each object would “produce a giant ball of fire”, like a rocket or a meteor does as it passes through the atmosphere, Loeb said. The fact that these objects were totally black doesn’t prove so much that they were otherworldly technology, but rather suggests that astronomers seriously miscalculated the objects’ respective locations, Loeb added.

Aliens, bombs or insects?

In his critique of the UAP report, Loeb suggested that the Ukrainian researchers probably miscalculated the distances to the phantom objects by a factor of 10; if the ghosts were 10 times closer to the camera than the researchers claimed, then the objects suddenly matched the size and velocity of artillery shells – a common projectile found in war zones like Ukraine. Move the objects another 10 times closer to the camera and they could reasonably be interpreted as bullets.

“If you get it even closer, it could be insects – like a fly moving at high speed near the telescope, and it would look dark,” Loeb added.

NASU appears to have reached a similar conclusion in its investigation of the UAP report, noting that astronomers not only made “significant errors” in determining the distances of the objects, but also failed to rule out more explanations. obvious to observations.

“The authors do not provide arguments that natural phenomena or man-made objects of terrestrial origin could be among the observed UAPs,” the NASU scientists wrote in their statement.

While it’s unclear exactly what Ukrainian astronomers observed — be it artillery, bullets, insects, or anything else — the impact of the invasion of the country by the Russia should not be ignored.

According to a 2021 report from the United States Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), it is likely that at least some UAPs observed by US military personnel are “technology deployed by China, Russia, another country or non-governmental entity”.

Other possible explanations for UAP include “air clutter”, such as birds and balloons; atmospheric phenomena, such as ice crystals; or classified government projects, according to the ODNI report

The report does not mention extraterrestrials as a possible explanation. However, the US government is not prepared to rule out this possibility for observations in US airspace. Earlier this year, the US Congress approved funding for the Department of Defense to open a new office focused exclusively on management of UFO sighting reports by the US military. If the truth is out there, maybe the government will find it.

Related posts:

  1. How military science popularized layered clothing
  2. LSU Military Science Building and declining program | Daily
  3. Military science joins forces with Lycée de Lyon to offer ROTC
  4. New Military Science Professor Brings ‘People-Centered’ Culture to Army ROTC | New

Categories

  • Military alliance
  • Military budget
  • Military headlines
  • Military science
  • Military uniform

Recent Posts

  • Iran begins enriching uranium to 60% purity at Fordow plant
  • Rome Science Museum
  • Scientific experiments with terrifying consequences
  • REVIEW | Netflix’s sleeper hit Warrior Nun S2 merges science and religion
  • Book review: The Political Science of the Middle East: Theory and Research Since the Arab Uprisings edited by Marc Lynch, Jillian Schwedler and Sean Yom

Archives

  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • December 2015
  • May 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • July 2013
  • January 2011
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions