Ohio POW MIA

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Military uniform
  • Military science
  • Military headlines
  • Military alliance
  • Military budget

Ohio POW MIA

Header Banner

Ohio POW MIA

  • Home
  • Military uniform
  • Military science
  • Military headlines
  • Military alliance
  • Military budget
Military uniform
Home›Military uniform›Add some faith to the military uniform

Add some faith to the military uniform

By Susan T. Johnson
January 27, 2014
0
0


A new military policy has gained the attention of online media in recent weeks to allow soldiers to incorporate religious clothing into their uniforms. This policy drew both criticism and praise from various groups, but could be seen as a positive step for those whose only obstacle to military service was an obligation to their religious teachings. The new policy, which was released by the Pentagon last week, changed long-standing uniform rules, which almost universally prohibited religious modifications to the uniform, to allow soldiers to request waivers on a case-by-case basis. These exemptions will allow soldiers to wear items of religious importance such as beards, turbans or kippahs as part of their uniform as long as these additions do not “negatively affect military readiness,” the accomplishment of the mission, the cohesion of the unit and good order and discipline. “

One of the religious groups that has been most positively affected by this policy change would be the Sikhs. Sikhism, a religion founded in India in the 15th century, has 25 million followers worldwide. Some Sikh teachings require practitioners to keep their hair (or beards) long and uncut, wear a turban and steel bracelet, and wear other religious items to live out their faith. As a result, despite the fact that many Sikhs might be interested in serving in the military, very few were actually able to practice their religious teachings – only three Sikh officers currently serving in the US military were allowed to follow the Sikh religion. lessons on hairdressing and clothing.

Religious leaders in the Sikh community have both praised the new policy for its openness and criticized it for its ultimate form, which still requires deviation on a case-by-case basis. Sikh Coalition spokesperson Amardeep Singh said The Huffington Post that although this was the first time the Pentagon had expressed its willingness to work with soldiers and make accommodations, the fact that it was ultimately a case-by-case decision was troubling. “What is disappointing […] is that the alleged ban on Sikh articles of faith remains […] A Sikh cannot simply enlist in the United States military and expect that he will not have to make the wrong choice between his faith and his service to the country.

On this point, Singh is absolutely right. The Supreme Court upheld the principle that the army’s authority to maintain discipline and order trumps the First Amendment rights of soldiers to freely exercise their religion while wearing religious clothing. The most notable Supreme Court decision on this issue is Goldman v. Weinberger, a 1986 case in which an Air Force officer, who was an ordained rabbi, was penalized by his superiors for wearing a kippah while on duty. The officer continued, claiming his First Amendment rights had been violated.

The Supreme Court, however, disagreed and ruled in favor of the military. In his majority opinion Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist stated in part that “the desirability of dress regulations in the military is decided by the appropriate military officials, and they have no constitutional mandate to abandon their judgment. professional. […] the First Amendment does not oblige the military to adapt to such [religious] practices in the face of his opinion that they would undermine the uniformity sought by the dress regulations.

Because of Goldman decision, the military has absolutely no obligation to accommodate soldiers who wish to follow religious teachings on clothing or physical appearance while on duty. Contrary to the hard line won by the military in this case, this new policy suggests that the Pentagon now believes it can maintain military cohesion while allowing more fluid forms of religious expression. However, military leaders still retain the ultimate ability to decide when these accommodations may still undermine military discipline through their ability to issue or revoke waivers.

While this question may seem trivial to some, it is of great importance not only to those who genuinely wish to live out their religious teachings, but to society as a whole. America has gone through a period of significant adjustment over the past decade in the way religious groups participate in the public arena, and issues range from predictable topics like same-sex marriage and birth control to more unexpected topics, such as whether or not churches can legally feed the homeless in some cities across the country. While the trend lately has been to restrict or limit the role that religious groups can play, policy changes like these are an encouraging sign to the faithful that while some doors close, others have – within reason – started to open.

David Giffin is an alumnus of the Masters of Theological Studies program at the Candler School of Theology and currently attends Wake Forest University Law School. He is from Charleston, Illinois.

Illustration by Mariana Hernandez


Related posts:

  1. Prince Harry News: Duke’s Last Moment in Military Uniform Revealed by Expert | Royal | New
  2. TMC says BJP is trying to replace Ashoka emblem on military uniform with party logo
  3. Prince Harry News: Expert Sets Record on Ban on Military Uniforms at Funeral | Royal | New
  4. Kim Jong Un seen saluting in military uniform as a young boy in family photos
Tagsair forceunited states

Categories

  • Military alliance
  • Military budget
  • Military headlines
  • Military science
  • Military uniform

Recent Posts

  • Japan to donate $2 million to IAEA for Ukrainian nuclear security
  • Falklands 40: Headlines from The News, Portsmouth, 18 May 1982
  • ANALYSIS-Putin takes Mariupol, but wider Donbass victory is out of reach
  • Charity food production chain reaches out to displaced people in Dnipro, Ukraine
  • Hungarian army finds mission in life for abused dog

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • May 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • July 2013
  • January 2011
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions